Add to ORKGKinkopf believes that the House of Representatives\u27 decision to impeach Pres Clinton on the charge that he committed perjury before the grand jury, a charge that did not involve official conduct, was proper. Even though Pres Clinton\u27s misconduct was not a proper basis for impeachment or conviction, his case demonstrates that if would be terribly unwise to understand official misconduct to be a necessary element of a high crime or misdemeanor
This symposium addresses the difficult question of whether a President can be criminally prosecuted ...
Almost every state permits persons convicted of a crime to testify in either their own or another pe...
In recent years, presidential impeachment and removal from office has become a more prominent topic,...
Constitutional theorists have begun focusing a great deal of attention on constitutionalism outside ...
This Article had its genesis in a statement by the authors submitted to the House Judiciary Committe...
Article II of the United States Constitution reads, The President, Vice President, and all civil Of...
Gerhardt offers a general explanation of the federal impeachment process and relates it to the impea...
It is a long-established principle that presidential impeachment is an appropriate remedy only for “...
President Clinton was the first President to be impeached since Andrew Johnson in 1868. The impeachm...
In 1999, for only the second time in United States history, the Senate conducted an impeachment tria...
That a verdict may be impeached and set aside for misconduct of the jury, or for that of the court i...
This Article offers a new critique of Federal Rule of Evidence 609, which permits impeachment of cri...
The author begins his analysis with the statement that a constitutionally valid distinction between ...
The frequent investigations examining the possibility of executive misconduct suggest the country ev...
This study is concerned with the problem of determining the nature of impeachable offenses through a...
This symposium addresses the difficult question of whether a President can be criminally prosecuted ...
Almost every state permits persons convicted of a crime to testify in either their own or another pe...
In recent years, presidential impeachment and removal from office has become a more prominent topic,...
Constitutional theorists have begun focusing a great deal of attention on constitutionalism outside ...
This Article had its genesis in a statement by the authors submitted to the House Judiciary Committe...
Article II of the United States Constitution reads, The President, Vice President, and all civil Of...
Gerhardt offers a general explanation of the federal impeachment process and relates it to the impea...
It is a long-established principle that presidential impeachment is an appropriate remedy only for “...
President Clinton was the first President to be impeached since Andrew Johnson in 1868. The impeachm...
In 1999, for only the second time in United States history, the Senate conducted an impeachment tria...
That a verdict may be impeached and set aside for misconduct of the jury, or for that of the court i...
This Article offers a new critique of Federal Rule of Evidence 609, which permits impeachment of cri...
The author begins his analysis with the statement that a constitutionally valid distinction between ...
The frequent investigations examining the possibility of executive misconduct suggest the country ev...
This study is concerned with the problem of determining the nature of impeachable offenses through a...
This symposium addresses the difficult question of whether a President can be criminally prosecuted ...
Almost every state permits persons convicted of a crime to testify in either their own or another pe...
In recent years, presidential impeachment and removal from office has become a more prominent topic,...